Connect with us


Crypto Slangs to Know Before You Buy Bitcoin



Before venturing into any industry, it is very important to conduct proper research which also includes understanding the basic terminologies. Knowing the slang words used in a niche should be the first step for any newbie looking to delve into that niche. The crypto industry is not an exception, as it definitely has lots of slang words.

Therefore, before you buy bitcoin in Nigeria or any other cryptocurrency, it is important to look at these jargons. It is quite rare to read anything about cryptocurrency without coming across different slang. Getting familiar with these terms might require constant usage. As you dive deeper into the world of crypto, you will definitely get to understand most of them. To feed your curiosity about the numerous slangs in the crypto space, here are a few terms explained quite simply.


When you hear altcoin, you might think it is a coin on its own. However, if you check for its price or market capitalization, you’ll find that there’s no coin like that. However, Altcoin is simply a short form of “Alternative Coins”. It refers to any digital currency that is not bitcoin. It is not a crypto asset but a word for all the cryptocurrencies that were introduced after BTC. Ethereum(ETH), Litecoin(LTC), Chainlink(LINK), and every other cryptocurrency you know that is not BTC is an Altcoin.


FOMO is an abbreviation for “Fear of Missing Out”. The full meaning says everything you need to know about the slang. In a broad sense, FOMO is a kind of feeling that something good is about to pass you by. The feeling of anxiety that you are probably missing out on an event, opportunity, trend, or decisions that could be of great value and importance. The person experiencing FOMO is basically having the notion that some people are taking advantage of an event/trend that he/she is not. In crypto, FOMO means the feeling of not taking advantage of a price trend.

This feeling comes in when the price of an asset is increasing and you are looking to join the positive trend (buying the asset) in order not to miss out on the trend. You can also experience FOMO when an asset is experiencing a price fall. At this point, you are looking to sell your asset before the price goes further down. However, in both instances, the price of the assets can go in the opposite direction after you’ve made your decision. So imagine you buy bitcoin because the price is increasing and then after the purchase, the price starts to dip. You were basically affected by FOMO.


FUD means the “fear of uncertainty and doubt” spread by the media to affect the market. It is a term used when an individual is trying to create a panic state in the market. This is done by releasing unreliable information that gives a sentiment about an asset. FUD can actually cause the price of an asset to dip, not due to charts or analysis but due to the release of information that has no reliable backing. FUD will however make a trader either panic buy or sell an asset.


HODL is just a misspelled word of HOLD that was interpreted by the crypto community to mean “Hold on for Dear Life”. It simply means holding/keeping an asset instead of selling the asset. It is basically a strategy that involves holding your asset on a long-term basis even with a price dip. When there is a dip in the price of an asset, HODLers instead of selling the coins will continue to hold it. If you want to HODL bitcoin or any other asset, you have to buy BTC or the altcoin during the dip and hold with the hope that the price rises in the future.

HODL sounds like an easy strategy that requires two steps, buying and holding. However, to be a successful HODLer, you have to be patient, as the strategy could take months or even years before it works out. Because of the time it takes, holders are very prone to be affected by FOMO and FUD. These two can make you sell at low prices, ultimately making less profit than initially intended.


Bagholder is a crypto term for someone that has a worthless asset. When the price of a crypto asset is gradually declining, most investors tend to sell their assets to reduce their loss. However, some investors still choose to hold the coin with the hope that the coin will eventually rise. The coin, however, continues to dip to a point where the value of the coin is incredibly low. An investor with this kind of asset is called a “Bagholder”. They hold the coin until it becomes worthless.


A Whale is someone or an organization that holds a large amount of a particular crypto. With the number of assets they hold, they have some amount of power to control the market. They can carry out large trades that can have an impact on the market. So basically a bitcoin whale is an individual that holds a huge amount of bitcoin. If a bitcoin whale decides to purchase BTC or sell, it’s going to affect the bitcoin market price of BTC.


Bullish simply means “rising or increase”. A bullish trend is used to describe a situation when an asset is experiencing a price increase. It is an upward movement in the price of an asset. When an asset is going through a trend, traders look to buy the asset in order to take advantage of the bullish trend. When you buy bitcoin or any other altcoin because it is going through a bullish trend, such a trader is called a BULL.


A bearish trend is the opposite of a bullish trend. It is used to describe a situation when an asset is witnessing a price decline. It is used to describe the downward movement in the price of the cryptocurrency. Traders that look to benefit from a bearish market are called BEARs.

Learn about 100 more crypto slang words to improve your interaction in crypto blogs, chats, and meetings.

Source link

We only source and collect valueable knowledge and information and do display it for public good (under the freedom of information act)

All image + text copyrights belong to their respectful owner, we do NOT claim any rights over those.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Are CBDCs the Future of Money or Just a Pipe Dream?




Central Bank Digital Currencies are often touted as the future of money. They scare some and excite others. What’s the truth?

According to the Atlantic Council CBDC tracker, 114 countries, representing over 95 percent of global GDP, are exploring a CBDC. 11 countries, including Nigeria and the Bahamas, have already launched theirs. China is currently piloting a system that will expand to the entire country this year.

The Bank of Finland introduced the Avant smart card in 1993, intended to work as an electronic form of cash. Even though the Finnish government eventually abandoned the project in the early 2000s, it is widely considered the world’s first CBDC.

Their appeal for central governments is obvious: they give central banks — the issuers of currency — an electronic version for them to monitor and control. For vendors, they offer a way of sending and receiving payments that are near instantaneous and do not require an intermediary like a commercial bank.

Currently, when we pay for a good or service, we rely on intermediaries to handle the transaction. Card payments, mobile money, and electronic transfers all require them. A CBDC would be a peer-to-peer exchange, similar to exchanging banknotes or sending BTC or ETH.

Put simply, CBDCs will be the digital equivalent of a digital banknote or coin. 

Project Icebreaker, a collaboration between the central banks of Israel, Sweden, and Norway and the BIS Innovation Center, is currently at work on an interoperable CBDC system that will allow different CBDCs to interact across borders. Experts agree that widespread use of this technology is only a few years away.

The crypto community has other ideas, and it’s easy to see why. 

The crypto community was founded on a series of clear ideas and principles. One that centralized financial institutions, like the banks that caused the Great Recession, had too much power. (And the power they did have, they often misused.) Two, other centralized institutions (like governments) also had too much power. And three, that individuals had a right to operate in society without both of their oversight. You can sum it up in three words: decentralization, freedom, and privacy.

Therein lies the rub. CBDCs, as they are currently envisaged, do not offer the same degree of privacy as cash or certain cryptocurrencies. In theory, central banks would have access to all transaction data. Whilst most blockchains make all transactions traceable, they are not tied to your real-world identity.

We are unlikely to get ever a truly private CBDC, says Hugo Volz Oliveira, Secretary and founding member at New Economy Institute. “The current forms of digital money aren’t private by design, and CBDC won’t be too. Only cash and some privacy-focused cryptocurrencies are truly anonymous – and even then, one must always be careful if they are expecting their use of money to be private. More worryingly, CBDCs can be used to sanction individuals without the cooperation of the judicial system.”

Legendary cryptographer David Chaum (known as the ‘Godfather of Privacy’) announced last year that he is working on a privacy-protecting CBDC with the Swiss National Bank (SNB.) BeInCrypto understands that he has been working on this project for some years. The concept has been outlined in a joint research paper by Chaum and Thomas Moser from the SNB.

According to the announcement, the technology will also be quantum-resistant. So, nothing to worry about, then?

Why Not Just Stablecoins?

For many critics of CBDC, there is a perfectly good option waiting in the wings. Although they are intended for a different purposes, a successful stablecoin offers the same value as the fiat currency it imitates. Both are used as a store of value and to facilitate cross-border exchange, but one is regulated by a central authority.

“As long as the regulatory environment remains favorable for private stablecoins like Circle (USDC), there is no reason we necessarily need CBDCs. I also think it’s more “American” (and thus likely) for the U.S. Government to strongly regulate a private industry than to compete with it directly, and the same goes for stablecoins,” says Adam Miller, CEO of MIDAO.

Whilst the direction of travel looks clear, not everyone is convinced we will end up in a world of universal CBDC use. “I think it’s more likely that governments will make their currency systems more and more digital (but still centralized/federated), as the U.S. has been doing for years and continues to do, but not go as far as launching CBDCs that are truly censorship resistant or having other qualities of real blockchains,” continues Miller. 

Wholesale Use of CBDCs

Research by the IMF states that another benefit of CBDC is its ability to reduce carbon emissions. However, the greatest benefit of CBDC is almost certainly its efficiency and its ability to reduce friction in payments. 

In use cases where individual privacy is less of a concern, the technology could come into its own. In particular, when banks and other financial institutions have to transact with each other.

“However, if we’re talking about wholesale CBDC—used for settlement between financial institutions—then there are some interesting pros,” continues Oliveira. “Namely efficiency and savings which result from the digital transformation of processes which are still largely bureaucratic and manual. These wouldn’t fundamentally change the current system nor make retail banks irrelevant.” 

At the time of writing, eight countries are working on a wholly wholesale CBDC. Twenty-one countries intend to use CBDCs for retail and wholesale purposes, including the U.S., China, India, and Australia.


All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.

Source link

We only source and collect valueable knowledge and information and do display it for public good (under the freedom of information act)

All image + text copyrights belong to their respectful owner, we do NOT claim any rights over those.

Continue Reading


US Treasury Sanctions Hit Russian Arms Dealer’s Crypto Wallets




The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has imposed full blocking sanctions on 22 individuals and entities across several countries, including Russia and Cyprus, as part of its sanctions evasion network that supports Russia’s military-industrial complex.

The sanctions were imposed under Executive Order 14024 and are part of the U.S.’s strategy to target sanctions evasion globally, close key channels, and limit Russia’s access to revenue for its war in Ukraine.

US Treasury Goes After Russian Arms Dealer’s Cryptos

The U.S. Treasury’s sanctions were imposed by the Russian Elites, Proxies, and Oligarchs (REPO) Task Force, a multilateral effort to identify, freeze, and seize assets of sanctioned Russians worldwide. This task force leverages information from international REPO partners and key data from Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to share information, track Russian assets, and sever Russian proxies from the international financial system.

The REPO Task Force aims to maximize the impact of multilateral sanctions while preventing opportunities for Russia to evade or circumvent U.S. and partner sanctions.

The primary target of the sanctions is a Russian sanctions evasion network led by Russia and Cyprus-based arms dealer Igor Zimenkov and his son Jonatan Zimenkov. The Zimenkov network has been involved in projects related to Russia’s defense capabilities, including supplying a Russian company with high-tech devices after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. They have also supported sanctioned state-owned Russian defense entities, Rosoboroneksport OAO and State Corporation Rostec, which are critical components of Russia’s military-industrial complex.

Igor and Jonatan Zimenkov have worked closely together to enable Russian defense sales to third-party governments and have engaged directly with Rosoboroneksport’s potential clients to facilitate sales of Russian defense material. Igor Zimenkov has also supported the Belarusian military-industrial complex by enabling the sales efforts of State Owned Foreign Trade Unitary Enterprise Belspetsvneshtechnika in Latin America.

Today, Igor Zimenkov was designated for operating in the defense and related materiel sector of the Russian Federation economy, while Jonatan Zimenkov was designated for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for Igor Zimenkov, Rosoboroneksport, and other sanctioned entities.

The Zimenkov network used front companies to funnel money and maintain a lawful appearance. Singapore-based Zimenkov network shell company Asia Trading & Construction PTE Limited and its director, Serena Bee Lin Ng, have sold helicopters to clients in Africa on behalf of the Zimenkov network. Additionally, Cyprus-based Zimenkov network shell company Lobster Management Limited and its director, Mikhail Petrov, have facilitated sanctions evasion by providing support to sanctioned entities.

The Treasury’s OFAC continues to work with its international partners to coordinate information sharing and enforcement and to travel the world in pursuit of sanctions evasion. The sanctions imposed today are a clear signal to Russia and its military-industrial complex that the U.S. and its partners are committed to tightening sanctions enforcement and preventing the evasion of international sanctions.


BeInCrypto has reached out to company or individual involved in the story to get an official statement about the recent developments, but it has yet to hear back.

Source link

We only source and collect valueable knowledge and information and do display it for public good (under the freedom of information act)

All image + text copyrights belong to their respectful owner, we do NOT claim any rights over those.

Continue Reading


Digital Wallet Growth Will Enable More Closed-Loop Transactions




Crypto and fintech investment firm Ark Invest has made bold predictions about digital wallets, estimating that more than half the world will soon be using at least one.

In its Jan. 31 ‘Big Ideas 2023’ research report, Ark Invest revealed that digital wallet global population penetration is currently 40%. This equates to around 3.2 billion users, the firm added.

However, the research suggests that the number of online wallet users will increase at an annual rate of 8%. The firm predicted that this will result in a global population penetration of 65% by 2030:

“Having onboarded billions of consumers and millions of merchants, digital wallets could transform the economics associated with traditional payment transactions, saving them nearly $50 billion in costs.”

It also noted that digital wallets were gaining market share in online and offline transactions. Cash is definitely in decline, accelerated by government initiatives to go digital, as recently seen in Nigeria.

Payment method trends - Ark Invest
Payment method trends – Ark Invest

Digital Wallet Growth to Continue

Ark reported that digital wallets were scaling faster than accounts at traditional financial institutions. Furthermore, U.S. digital wallet adoption rebounded in 2022, surpassing previous highs following a COVID-induced dip.

The firm estimates that U.S. digital wallet users will increase by 7% annually during the next eight years. This will be a growth of around 160 million in 2022 to more than 260 million by the end of the decade.

Digital wallet user growth - Ark Invest
Digital wallet user growth – Ark Invest

Furthermore, online wallets are enabling “closed-loop” ecosystems. This is where consumers and merchants can transact directly, cutting out the middleman. 

“Digital wallets are onboarding millions of merchants to platforms that enable direct consumer-merchant transactions that disintermediate traditional financial institutions,” it noted.

In this closed-loop environment, wallet providers capture more value per transaction, enabling savings to be shared with merchants and consumers.

Open and Closed Lopp transactions - Ark Invest
Open and Closed Lopp transactions – Ark Invest

Additionally, Ark noted that closed-loop transactions could boost the margin structure of wallet providers.

It used Block Inc. (formerly Square) as an example, stating that it paid around 60% of customer transaction fees to third parties in 2022. The fees were paid for interchange, assessment, processing, and bank settlement fees. Block’s net take rate could more than double if customers transacted directly with merchants.

Block Inc. fee structure - Ark Invest
Block Inc. fee structure – Ark Invest

Closed Loop Transactions Could Top 50%

Finally, Ark predicted that these closed-loop transactions could account for over 50% of digital payments by 2030.

It used China as an example where wallets and merchants are largely internal or domestic only.

Closed loop cost savings - Ark Invest
Closed loop cost savings – Ark Invest

In conclusion, digital wallet growth is set to continue. Cutting out the intermediary which they facilitate is beneficial to both the consumer and merchant.


BeInCrypto has reached out to company or individual involved in the story to get an official statement about the recent developments, but it has yet to hear back.

Source link

We only source and collect valueable knowledge and information and do display it for public good (under the freedom of information act)

All image + text copyrights belong to their respectful owner, we do NOT claim any rights over those.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2022